Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 September 20243338430

20 St. James Way, Sidcup, DA14 5ER

Planning appeal 3338430 at 20 St. James Way, Sidcup, DA14 5ER (London Borough of Bexley) was allowed on 10 September 2024 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed variation of condition 2 would be acceptable, having regard to the effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the High Beeches Conservation Area.

erection of six detached dwellings with access from St. James Way, parking and landscaping, without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 22/02548/FUL, dated 26 January 2023

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith J
Postcode
DA14 5ER

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed variation of condition 2 would be acceptable, having regard to the effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the High Beeches Conservation Area
  • Whether the proposed variation of condition 2 would be acceptable, having regard to the effect on living conditions within neighbouring properties, with particular regard to privacy and outlook

What decided it

The proposed design variations would preserve the approved hipped roof design approach and remain consistent with the appearance of the development as a whole, while the additional roof-level windows would not materially increase privacy concerns beyond the already-approved first floor windows.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP5Policy DP11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

111 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bexley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266013098
    Rear Of 110-112 Belvedere Road, Bexleyheath, DA7 4PF
  2. Allowed19 October 20266010781
    126 Crayford Road, Crayford, Dartford, DA1 4ES
  3. Allowed12 October 20266004983
    Land to the Rear of No. 48 Sidcup High Street, Bexley, DA14 6EH
  4. Allowed2 October 20266012368
    35 Cumberland Drive, Bexleyheath, DA7 5LA
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266012819
    17 Percy Road, Bexleyheath, DA7 4DZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.