Planning appeal decision
Land East of Rayleigh Road, Thundersley, SS7 3NL
Planning appeal 3338797 at Land East of Rayleigh Road, Thundersley, SS7 3NL (Castle Point Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 August 2024 by Inspector Dawe A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt.
Outline planning application for the development of up to 455 new homes, a new multi-use community hall, land for the provision of a healthcare facility, land for a stand-alone early years and childcare nursery, new vehicular/pedestrian access points from Stadium Way in the north and Daws Heath Road in the south, new greenways and green links, multi-functional open space, green infrastructure, surface water attenuation, landscaping and associated infrastructure. All matters reserved except access
- Authority
- Castle Point Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Dawe A
- Postcode
- SS7 3UB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The cumulative Green Belt harm (inappropriateness, loss of openness and conflict with Green Belt purposes), together with harm to character and appearance and BMVAL loss, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist.
the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, loss of openness, conflict with Green Belt purposes, harm to character and appearance, and limited harm from loss of BMVAL was not clearly outweighed by the substantial and other weighted benefits (housing and affordable housing delivery, economic benefits, biodiversity net gain and community facilities), so very special circumstances did not exist and the balance tipped against the proposal
What the Inspector cited
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 180
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Castle Point
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed6 October 202660095891 Mount Zion, Castle Lane, Hadleigh, SS7 2AR
- Allowed14 September 20266007184Land South Of Daws Heath Road, Thundersley, SS7 2TA
- Dismissed27 May 20266002484Daxhamen Bassenthwaite Road, Thundersley, Benfleet, Essex, SS7 3JG
- Quashed On Legal Grounds30 April 20263335033Mount View , Rhoda Road, Benfleet, Essex, SS7 1HZ
- Allowed6 February 20266001753Homestead, Canvey Road, Canvey Island, Essex, SS8 0QD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®