Planning appeal decision
38 Blackhills, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9JW
Planning appeal 3339401 at 38 Blackhills, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9JW (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 29 November 2024 by Inspector Lawrence R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of amending the conditions, with particular regard to the enlarged lightwell on the Green Belt, including whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt.
a detached two-storey house incorporating attached garage with rooms in the roof space and entrance gate to a height of 2.55m following demolition of existing house and outbuilding without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref 2020/2694, dated 11/12/2020
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Lawrence R
- Postcode
- KT10 9JW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of amending the conditions, with particular regard to the enlarged lightwell on the Green Belt, including whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The enlarged and enclosed lightwell would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt and result in moderate harm to openness, which is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM18Policy DM2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed7 August 202660049854, Felix Lane, Shepperton Surrey, TW17 8NJ
- Dismissed16 July 20266007665Whitewood, Redhill Road, Cobham, KT11 1EF
- Dismissed29 June 20266007101The Cottage, Byfleet Road, Cobham, KT111DS
- Dismissed4 June 20266006584Hillsway, Downside Common Road,, Downside, Cobham, KT11 3NP
- Dismissed9 March 20263356517Silvermere Golf Club, Redhill Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1EF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®