®Planning appeal decision
Sunshine, 2 Temple Mead Close, Stanmore, HA7 3RG
alterations to the approved rear dormer
- Authority
- London Borough of Harrow
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Greenwood L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the house and the local area.
- Appeal B: The effects of the proposal on (i) the character and appearance of the house and the local area; and (ii) living conditions at neighbouring properties.
What decided it
The proposed dormers in Appeal A would be visually contained within the roof profile and sit comfortably within the street scene, while in Appeal B the restrictive conditions on permitted development rights failed to meet the Framework tests of reasonableness and necessity given the site's tight constraints.
Plan policies cited: London Plan policy D3(D1 and D11), London Plan policy D3(D7), London Plan policy G7(C), Harrow Core Strategy policy CS1(B), Harrow Development Management Policies policy DM1, Harrow Development Management Policies policy DM22, Harrow Supplementary Planning Document Residential Design Guide
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.