Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 November 20243339666

East Lodge Mitcham Park, MITCHAM, CR4 4EG

demolition of existing two-storey building and erection of two-storey building with roof accommodation consisting of 6 self-contained flats (1 x 4- bed, 2 x 3-bed, 2 x 2-bed, 1 x 1-bed) all with private outside amenity space and access to secure/enclosed cycle and refuse storage

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Marigold O
Postcode
CR4 4EG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the Mitcham Cricket Conservation Area (CA), within which the site sits
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby properties with regard to privacy, outlook, light and noise
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for car-free development
  • whether the proposal would provide suitable cycle and bin storage
  • whether the proposal makes adequate provision for the impacts and risks of flooding

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area character and appearance, combined with unacceptable impacts on neighbouring living conditions, inadequate car-free provision, unsuitable cycle and bin storage design, and unaddressed groundwater flooding risk, collectively outweighed the modest housing and economic benefits of the proposal.

Framework references: 11, 125

Plan policies cited: DMD2, DMD4, DMD3, CS14, D3, D4, HC1, DMT1, DMT2, DMT3, CS20, T4, T6, SI7, CS17, CS18, T5, CS16, SI12, DMF1, SI13, DMF2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.