Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 October 20243339670

Afton Cottage, Adlers Lane, Westhumble, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 6AS

Planning appeal 3339670 at Afton Cottage, Adlers Lane, Westhumble, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 6AS (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 22 October 2024 by Inspector Buchanan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including its effect on the openness of the Green Belt, having regard to local and national planning policy.

demolition of outbuildings and erection of 1 No. dwelling together with associated access, parking and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Buchanan R
Postcode
RH5 6AS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including its effect on the openness of the Green Belt, having regard to local and national planning policy
  • its effect on the character of the area surrounding the site
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness and notable harm to character, and the modest housing supply benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm to amount to very special circumstances.

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and notable harm to character were weighed against modest housing supply benefits and self-build considerations; the harm substantially outweighed the benefits and very special circumstances were not established.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP Policies ENV22LP Policies ENV23LP Policies ENV24CS Policy CS14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 154
Judgments
Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  3. Dismissed16 October 20266010203
    High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS
  4. Dismissed16 September 20266008528
    Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
  5. Allowed11 September 20266012763
    Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.