Planning appeal decision
Rushcliffe Golf Club, Stocking Lane, East Leake, Loughborough, LE12 5RL
Planning appeal 3339878 at Rushcliffe Golf Club, Stocking Lane, East Leake, Loughborough, LE12 5RL (Rushcliffe Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 September 2024 by Inspector Billings C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.
the erection of 3no. dwellings with associated vehicular access
- Authority
- Rushcliffe Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Billings C
- Postcode
- LE12 5RL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the appeal site offers a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to the development plan policies that support sustainable development
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- whether there would be suitable living conditions for the future occupants of the dwellings, in particular regard to outdoor space provision and ball-strike from the adjacent golf course
- whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm caused by inappropriate development in the Green Belt and loss of openness, combined with harm to character and appearance, unsuitable location, and inadequate living conditions, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of golf club funding and modest housing contribution.
The benefits of golf club enhancement, housing delivery, sustainable design, and biodiversity net gain did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm from inappropriateness and loss of Green Belt openness, the harm to character and appearance, the unsustainable location, and the inadequate living conditions for future occupiers.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 21 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2Policy 3 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1Policy 1 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2Policy 10 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1Policy 4 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1Policy 13 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2Policy 38 of the Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 142Paragraph 135Paragraph 12
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rushcliffe
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed9 June 20266004544137 Melton Road, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5PJ
- Allowed1 June 20266005540200 Melton Road, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5BP
- Allowed5 May 2026600641978 Cropwell Road, Radcliffe On Trent, Nottinghamshire, NG12 2JG
- Notice varied and upheld8 September 20253337651Riverside, Fairham Brook Lane, Bunny, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG11 0GB
- Allowed16 June 20253358676Land North West of Lammas Farm, Kneeton Road, East Bridgford, Nottinghamshire, NG13 8PJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®