Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 August 20243340344

77 St Annes Road, Headingley, LEEDS, LS6 3NZ

part two storey and part single storey side and rear extension and new dormer window to front

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
McCormack A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed front dormer window extension on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed dormer window extension would be a visually dominant and incongruous feature that would fail to respect the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the wider area where a broadly consistent and uniform frontage appearance predominates.

Framework references: 131, 139

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds Core Strategy 2014, Policy GP5 of the Leeds UDP Review 2006, Policy BD6 of the Leeds UDP Review 2006, Policy HDG1 of the Design Guide

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.