Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed25 November 20243340496

2 Lambourne Drive, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 3LB

Planning appeal 3340496 at 2 Lambourne Drive, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 3LB (Elmbridge Borough Council) was allowed on 25 November 2024 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the disputed condition is reasonable and necessary in the interests of the living conditions of occupiers at No. 3 Lambourne Drive, with particular regard to privacy.

single storey rear extension and increase in height of garage roof to accommodate room over with front dormer windows without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2011/0268 dated 31 March 2011

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
KT11 3LB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the disputed condition is reasonable and necessary in the interests of the living conditions of occupiers at No. 3 Lambourne Drive, with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The condition requiring an obscure screen is neither reasonable nor necessary because the external door, landing space and staircase it was designed to protect against are not present, and the window that replaced them does not result in unacceptable overlooking of the neighbouring property.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ENV5 of the Replacement Elmbridge Local Plan 2000Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan 2015Policy CS10 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy 2011Policy CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy 2011

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

133 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266013396
    23 Avondale Avenue, Esher, KT10 0DB
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266013327
    69 Alexandra Road, Thames Ditton, KT7 0QS
  3. Dismissed16 October 20266008605
    Pavement Outside Tesco Stores Ltd, 108 - 118 Walton Road East Molesey, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266008598
    Pavement Outside Tesco Ltd, 108 – 118 Walton Road, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
  5. Allowed14 October 20266009254
    Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, KT10 9AD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.