Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld22 October 20243340590

20 Oakville Road, Heysham, Lancaster, LA3 2TB

‘Without planning permission, the erection of a boundary wall and gate over 1m in height, adjacent to the highway’

Authority
Lancaster City Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Hitchcock R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control or injury to amenity (Ground f)
  • Whether the period for compliance specified in the notice is reasonable (Ground g)

What decided it

The enforcement notice provides a reasonable alternative remedy by allowing reduction of the wall to 1m height (the maximum permitted under General Permitted Development Order), which had previously been found acceptable in planning terms, and the 2-month compliance period is reasonable.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.