Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed12 September 20243340666

58 Long Lane, ICKENHAM, UB10 8SZ

single storey side extension, porch to front involving demolition of existing garage, porch and shed and replacement boundary wall and installation of bike/store without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 18540/APP/2020/3644, dated 22/12/2020

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Robinson N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect that varying the condition would have on the character and appearance of the appeal property and the surrounding area including the Ickenham Village Conservation Area

What decided it

The porch extension, in the context of the large host dwelling and spacious plot, does not appear as an over-dominant or obtrusive feature and is consistent with the design of the host building, thereby preserving the character and appearance of the conservation area.

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy HE1, Policy DMHB 1, Policy DMHB 4, Policy DMHB 11, Policy DMHB 12, Policy DMHD 1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.