Planning appeal decision
50 Tudor Lodge Hotel, Field End Road, Ruislip, Hillingdon, HA5 2QN
Planning appeal 3340798 at 50 Tudor Lodge Hotel, Field End Road, Ruislip, Hillingdon, HA5 2QN (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 7 November 2024 by Inspector Smith H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would i) preserve a Grade II listed building, or its setting, or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses, and ii) preserve or enhance the setting of the Eastcote Park Estate Conservation Area.
proposed external work with the following: 1. new car parking layout, 2. Resurfacing and expansion of hardstanding, 3. Sunken paving area with pergola, 4. Standalone outbuilding for WC and store, 5. Staff cycle shelter, 6. New boundary fence and planting against Field End Road, 7. Various landscape planting, 8. Paving to external pergola sitting area
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Smith H
- Postcode
- HA5 2QN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would i) preserve a Grade II listed building, or its setting, or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses, and ii) preserve or enhance the setting of the Eastcote Park Estate Conservation Area
- Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for car parking
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to trees
What decided it
The proposal would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the significance of the Grade II listed building and the setting of the Eastcote Park Estate Conservation Area through the introduction of a discordant modern pergola and expansion of hardstanding, which would not be outweighed by the moderate public benefits claimed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D8Policy HC1Policy BE1Policy DMHB 11Policy DMHB 12Policy DMHB 1Policy DMHB 2Policy DMHB 4Policy DME 5Policy T6.1Policy DMT 2Policy DMT 6Policy DMEI 14Policy G7Policy DHMB 14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 207Paragraph 208Paragraph 110Paragraph 111
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed7 August 2026600546910 Lawn Avenue, West Drayton, UB7 7AQ
- Dismissed23 July 2026600432914 Willow Tree Lane, Hayes, UB4 9BB
- Dismissed16 July 2026600586611 Maygoods View, High Road, Uxbridge, UB8 2HG
- Dismissed8 July 2026600758779 Fairholme Crescent, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8QU
- Dismissed12 June 2026600269596 Oakdene Road, Hillingdon, UB10 0SQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®