Planning appeal decision
Silk Mill Estate , Brook Street , Tring , Hertfordshire , HP23 5EF
Planning appeal 3341128 at Silk Mill Estate , Brook Street , Tring , Hertfordshire , HP23 5EF (Dacorum Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 December 2024 by Inspector Lancaster K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
the construction of a pair of semi-detached houses to the rear of the recently completed No.23-26 Brook Street, on land to the rear of the Old Silk Mill. Proposed development includes amenity space, private car parking, cycle and bin storage
- Authority
- Dacorum Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Lancaster K
- Postcode
- HP23 5EF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on the setting of The Silk Mill, a Grade II Listed Building
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with particular regard to car parking provision
- whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of private outdoor amenity space
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to outlook, privacy and light
- whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for landscaping, tree planting and biodiversity net gain
- the effect of the proposed development on the integrity the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation
What decided it
The harm to the setting of the Grade II listed building, which would not be outweighed by the modest public benefits of providing two additional dwellings, combined with the failure to demonstrate no adverse effects to the integrity of the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation, provided a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.
The presumption in favour of sustainable development was displaced by the clear reasons for refusal provided by heritage and ecological protections; the modest public benefits of housing delivery and economic activity did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the listed building's setting.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS10Saved Policy 10Policy CS11Policy CS12Policy CS13Policy CS26Policy CS27Policy CS29Policy 10Policy 100Policy CC12(b)Policy CS27Saved Policy 119
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 199Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dacorum
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed26 October 20266003892Bulbourne Wood, New Road, Northchurch, Berkhamsted, HP4 1LN
- Allowed14 October 20266006896Apsley Depot, Ebberns Road, Apsley, HP3 9RE
- Dismissed2 October 20266011489Plot HD587047 of Lot B2A, Upper Bourne End Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 2RR
- Dismissed13 July 2026600572287 Chambersbury Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8BD
- Dismissed22 April 2026600393963 Dunlin Road, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, HP2 6LY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®