Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 December 20243341128

Silk Mill Estate , Brook Street , Tring , Hertfordshire , HP23 5EF

Planning appeal 3341128 at Silk Mill Estate , Brook Street , Tring , Hertfordshire , HP23 5EF (Dacorum Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 December 2024 by Inspector Lancaster K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

the construction of a pair of semi-detached houses to the rear of the recently completed No.23-26 Brook Street, on land to the rear of the Old Silk Mill. Proposed development includes amenity space, private car parking, cycle and bin storage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lancaster K
Postcode
HP23 5EF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the setting of The Silk Mill, a Grade II Listed Building
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with particular regard to car parking provision
  • whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of private outdoor amenity space
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to outlook, privacy and light
  • whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for landscaping, tree planting and biodiversity net gain
  • the effect of the proposed development on the integrity the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation

What decided it

The harm to the setting of the Grade II listed building, which would not be outweighed by the modest public benefits of providing two additional dwellings, combined with the failure to demonstrate no adverse effects to the integrity of the Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation, provided a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.

The presumption in favour of sustainable development was displaced by the clear reasons for refusal provided by heritage and ecological protections; the modest public benefits of housing delivery and economic activity did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the listed building's setting.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS10Saved Policy 10Policy CS11Policy CS12Policy CS13Policy CS26Policy CS27Policy CS29Policy 10Policy 100Policy CC12(b)Policy CS27Saved Policy 119
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 199Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

48 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dacorum

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266003892
    Bulbourne Wood, New Road, Northchurch, Berkhamsted, HP4 1LN
  2. Allowed14 October 20266006896
    Apsley Depot, Ebberns Road, Apsley, HP3 9RE
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266011489
    Plot HD587047 of Lot B2A, Upper Bourne End Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 2RR
  4. Dismissed13 July 20266005722
    87 Chambersbury Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8BD
  5. Dismissed22 April 20266003939
    63 Dunlin Road, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, HP2 6LY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.