Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 November 20243341439

Land at Stubcroft Farm, Church Road, East Wittering, West Sussex, PO20 8PU

the erection of residential dwellings (including affordable housing), associated highway and landscape works, open space and flexible retail and community floorspace (Use Classes E and F)

Authority
Chichester District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Harwood A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the risks of flooding of the site due to coastal flooding on the basis of the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) modelling for future flood risk and whether a Sequential Test is required
  • the effect of the proposals upon the highway network with respect to the level of financial contribution towards A27 mitigation
  • The effect of the proposals on the supply of the best and most versatile agricultural land

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate that the appeal sites were safe from future coastal flood risk, triggering an unmet requirement for a Sequential Test, combined with the loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, outweighed the benefits of the schemes.

The substantial benefits of housing and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate accessibility benefits and limited economic benefits, did not outweigh the unresolved flood risk harm and the adverse effect on best and most versatile agricultural land, and conflict with the development plan as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 168, 226

Plan policies cited: LP Policy 2, LP Policy 4, LP Policy 42, LP Policy 8, LP Policy 9, LP Policy 48, LP Policy 45, LP Policy 34

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.