Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed6 March 20253341745

City of London Freemens School, Park Lane , Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1ET

Planning appeal 3341745 at City of London Freemens School, Park Lane , Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1ET (Mole Valley District Council) was allowed on 6 March 2025 by Inspector Bowyer J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including with regard to the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.

erection of a replacement memorial building with associated access, car and cycle parking and landscaping, including woodland enhancement

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Other minor developments
Inspector
Bowyer J
Postcode
KT21 1ET

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including with regard to the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character of the landscape
  • The effect of the proposal on the significance of Ashtead Park Registered Park and Garden and Rookery Hill Bridge, a Grade II listed building
  • The effect of the proposal on protected species
  • Whether or not there would be adequate provision for biodiversity net gain
  • If the proposal would be inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development within the Green Belt

What decided it

The considerable health and social benefits arising from the provision of facilities for sport, recreation and community use, combined with support for community cohesion and the absence of suitable alternative locations, clearly outweighed the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and the limited harm to landscape character and heritage assets.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN1Policy EN4Policy EN6Policy EN8Policy EN9Policy AS-EN2Policy AS-EN3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

91 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266008528
    Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
  4. Allowed11 September 20266012763
    Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
  5. Dismissed9 September 20266005433
    Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.