Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 June 20243341873

9 Ashridge Drive, WATFORD, WD19 6TQ

Part Retrospective: construction of single storey front extension, single storey rear extension, first floor rear extensions including Juliet balcony and bay windows; construction of rear dormer including Juliet balcony and rooflights, front rooflights; alterations to external materials including provision of external render insulation, alterations to fenestration, insertion of air conditioning unit; construction of dropped kerb, vehicular crossover and driveway

Authority
Three Rivers District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Metcalfe P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Its effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • Its effect on the living conditions of neighbouring residents by reason of noise

What decided it

The development's excessive scale, mass and bulky form, when considered as a single integrated structure, are so out of proportion with the original house and terrace that they fail to respect existing character and local context, and the absence of a noise assessment for the air conditioning unit fails to demonstrate no loss of neighbouring residential amenity.

Plan policies cited: CP12 of the Core Strategy, DM1 and Appendix 2 of the Development Management Policies LDD, D9 of the Development Management Policies LDD

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.