Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed15 May 20253350428

Oak Lodge Toms Lane, Kings Langley, WD4 8NH

Planning appeal 3350428 at Oak Lodge Toms Lane, Kings Langley, WD4 8NH (Three Rivers District Council) was allowed on 15 May 2025 by Inspector Watson S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be unacceptable without a monetary contribution towards the provision of affordable housing off-site.

the erection of a 2 storey dwellinghouse on land adjacent Oak Lodge

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Watson S
Postcode
WD4 8NH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be unacceptable without a monetary contribution towards the provision of affordable housing off-site

What decided it

The acute shortage of affordable housing in the plan area and the contribution of one new dwelling to addressing this shortfall, combined with the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, outweighed the conflict with LDF Policy CP4 under the tilted balance test.

The conflict with LDF Policy CP4 regarding affordable housing contribution was outweighed by the significant weight attached to the acute shortage of affordable housing in the plan area, the contribution of one new dwelling to this shortfall, and the limited economic and social benefits, in the context of the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply and the application of NPPF Paragraph 11d.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP4Development Management Policy DM4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 11Paragraph 65

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

103 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Three Rivers

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed24 September 20266010198
    Rusper, Nottingham Road, Heronsgate, WD3 5DN
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266011803
    126 Toms Lane, Kings Langley, WD4 8NR
  3. Dismissed12 August 20266006827
    Land Adjacent to Sarratt Lane, Loudwater, WD3 4AS
  4. Dismissed21 July 20266003684
    156 the Drive, Rickmansworth, WD34DH
  5. Dismissed30 June 20266004957
    Land Adjoining Westwood End, Bucks Hill, Kings Langley, WD4 9AS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.