Planning appeal decision
Riverside Paddocks, New Inn Fields, BORDON, GU35 9LH
without planning permission and within the last 10 years, the material change of use of land to a B8 business use for the storage of builder’s materials and equipment (reclamation tiles and bricks and other materials)
- Authority
- East Hampshire District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- employment-industrial · Change of use
- Inspector
- Howell M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the alleged material change of use has occurred as a matter of fact (ground (b))
- Whether, if it has occurred, it amounts to a material change of use of the land given the claimed primary agricultural use (ground (c))
- Whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control (ground (f))
What decided it
The significant scale of builder's materials and equipment stored on the land was found not to be incidental to the agricultural use, establishing an unauthorised mixed use amounting to a material change of use.
Judgments cited: Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest DC [1972] 1 WLR 1207; Murfitt v SSE [1980] JPL 598; Somak Travel v SSE & Brent LBC [1987] JPL 630; Newbury DC v SSE & Mallaburn [1994] JPL 879; Mansi v Elstree RDC [1964] 16 P&CR 154
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®