Planning appeal decision
The Coach House, Wall Hill Road, Ashurst Wood, East Sussex, RH19 3TQ
Planning appeal 3341994 at The Coach House, Wall Hill Road, Ashurst Wood, East Sussex, RH19 3TQ (Wealden District Council) was dismissed on 20 December 2024 by Inspector Glassar S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development is suitable for the site having regard to local and national policies for the location of housing.
the replacement of existing stable block with single storey dwelling and associated soft landscaping
- Authority
- Wealden District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Glassar S
- Postcode
- RH19 3TQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development is suitable for the site having regard to local and national policies for the location of housing
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the High Weald National Landscape and non-designated heritage asset
- The effect of the proposed development on the Ancient Woodland
- The integrity of the Ashdown Forest Special Protection Area
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole due to its location in open countryside contrary to locational policies, and causes clear harm to the High Weald National Landscape, Ancient Woodland, Ashdown Forest SPA and a non-designated heritage asset, which provides clear reasons for refusal that displace the presumption in favour of sustainable development despite the Council's housing shortfall.
The benefits of the scheme (reinstating the wall, removing lighting columns, creating additional planting areas, and providing one additional dwelling) were outweighed by the clear harm to the High Weald National Landscape, Ancient Woodland, Ashdown Forest SPA and the significance of a non-designated heritage asset, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply despite the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GD2Policy DC17Policy DC8Spatial Planning Objectives SPO1Spatial Planning Objectives SPO7Policy WCS6Policy EN1Policy EN6Spatial Planning Objectives SPO2Spatial Planning Objectives SPO13Policy WCS14Policy EN13Policy WCS12Policy EN15
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wealden District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed23 October 2026601128637 High Street, Frant, TN3 9DT
- Dismissed23 October 20266010554Ivy House, Mayfield Road, Mark Cross, Rotherfield, TN6 3PJ
- Dismissed6 October 20266011082Willow Farm, Under Road, Herstmonceux, BN27 1QE
- Notice varied and upheld28 September 20263356589Land An New House Farm, Buckham Hill, Isfield, East Sussex, TN22 5XU
- Dismissed25 September 20266009517Fairfield Cottage, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0SN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®