Planning appeal decision
18 Wilmar Close, HAYES, UB4 8ET
the erection of a two-storey rear extension with the insertion of 2 No. side facing windows. Demolition of garages and erection of outbuilding
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Andrews M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host properties and their surroundings
- The adequacy of the living conditions for future occupiers of the dwellings as regards outlook and light
What decided it
The visual harm caused by the disproportionate scale and incongruous form of the extensions to the original built form, combined with the inability to provide adequate outlook and natural light to bedroom 2 without compromising neighbours' privacy, outweighed any benefits.
Framework references: 135
Plan policies cited: Policy BE 1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part One – Strategic Policies 2012, Policy DMHB 11, Policy DMHB 12, Policy DMHB 16, Policy DMHD 1, Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®