Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 October 20243341999

18 Wilmar Close, HAYES, UB4 8ET

the erection of a two-storey rear extension with the insertion of 2 No. side facing windows. Demolition of garages and erection of outbuilding

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Andrews M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host properties and their surroundings
  • The adequacy of the living conditions for future occupiers of the dwellings as regards outlook and light

What decided it

The visual harm caused by the disproportionate scale and incongruous form of the extensions to the original built form, combined with the inability to provide adequate outlook and natural light to bedroom 2 without compromising neighbours' privacy, outweighed any benefits.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: Policy BE 1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part One – Strategic Policies 2012, Policy DMHB 11, Policy DMHB 12, Policy DMHB 16, Policy DMHD 1, Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.