Planning appeal decision
Gennetts Farm House, Gay Street Lane, North Heath, Pulborough, West Sussex, RH20 2HN
Planning appeal 3342546 at Gennetts Farm House, Gay Street Lane, North Heath, Pulborough, West Sussex, RH20 2HN (Horsham District Council) was dismissed on 11 December 2024 by Inspector Carpenter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be in a suitable location with respect to the settlement strategy.
5 new houses on a brownfield site
- Authority
- Horsham District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Carpenter C
- Postcode
- RH20 2HN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be in a suitable location with respect to the settlement strategy
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- whether the proposed development would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building known as Gennetts Farmhouse
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular reference to access and parking
- the effect of the proposal on the integrity of protected European sites, with particular reference to water neutrality
- the effect of the proposal on protected species and the measures necessary to avoid, mitigate or compensate for any negative effects
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole on multiple material grounds including settlement strategy, character and appearance, heritage setting, highway safety, water neutrality and protected species, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development is not engaged due to clear reasons for refusal relating to heritage assets and habitat sites.
The less than substantial harm to the significance of Gennetts Farmhouse as a designated heritage asset, to which great weight is attributed, is not outweighed by the moderate weight given to public benefits from housing provision and economic benefits; additionally, the significant weight of harms to settlement strategy, character and appearance, highway safety, biodiversity and protected species together outweigh the benefits of the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- HDPF Policy 1HDPF Policy 2HDPF Policy 3HDPF Policy 4HDPF Policy 25HDPF Policy 26HDPF Policy 31HDPF Policy 32HDPF Policy 33HDPF Policy 34HDPF Policy 40HDPF Policy 41
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 99Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Horsham District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266008830Staalcot Farm Stall House Lane, Stall House Lane, North Heath, RH20 2HR
- Allowed25 September 20266010268Priory Field Barn, Monastery Lane, Storrington, RH20 4LN
- Allowed24 September 20266007772The Lamb Inn, Lambs Green, Rusper, RH12 4RG
- Allowed24 August 20266007104Land Adjacent to Cedar Cottage, Furners Lane, Henfield, BN5 9HS
- Dismissed31 July 20266006904Rowan, Two Mile Ash, Horsham, RH13 0LA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®