Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 December 20243342558

Coutts Court, 75 Wallwood Street, London, E14 7GS

Planning appeal 3342558 at Coutts Court, 75 Wallwood Street, London, E14 7GS (London Borough of Tower Hamlets) was dismissed on 19 December 2024 by Inspector Bayliss G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of existing occupants with particular reference to privacy.

a roof extension on top of existing residential building to create two storeys to accommodate 5 residential units along with cycle infrastructure

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bayliss G
Postcode
E14 7GS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of existing occupants with particular reference to privacy
  • Whether or not the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for existing and future occupants with regard to waste management and communal amenity space
  • Whether or not the proposal would make acceptable provision for affordable housing

What decided it

The proposal would have a significantly harmful effect on the living conditions of existing occupants due to loss of privacy from the cycle store location and inadequate waste storage for both existing and future occupants, which cumulatively outweighed the modest benefits of additional housing supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D.DH8Policy D3Policy T5(E)Policy D.MW3Policy D.H3Policy S.H1Policy D.H2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 73Paragraph 124

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

324 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Tower Hamlets

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice varied and upheld30 September 20263368399
    232 Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1BJ
  2. Notice varied and upheld30 September 20263361722
    48A White Horse Road, London, E1 0ND
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266011009
    7 Douro Street, London, E3 2TS
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010662
    Pavement O/S, 43-47 Bethnal Green Road, London, E1 6LA
  5. Dismissed29 September 20266010661
    Pavement O/S, 43-47 Bethnal Green Road, London, E1 6LA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.