Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision6 February 20263342673

Land at Oak Meadow Farm, Honeybrook Lane, Kidderminster, Worcestershire, DY11 5QS

Planning appeal 3342673 at Land at Oak Meadow Farm, Honeybrook Lane, Kidderminster, Worcestershire, DY11 5QS (Wyre Forest District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 6 February 2026 by Inspector Ghafoor A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

Erection of a new dwellinghouse and the creation of a new access

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ghafoor A
Postcode
DY11 5QS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect on openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • Effect on landscape character
  • If the development constitutes inappropriate development, whether other considerations clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and any other harm so as to amount to very special circumstances

What decided it

The development met NPPF155 criteria for residential development in the Green Belt, particularly the demonstrable unmet need for self-build housing plots, and any landscape harm could be adequately mitigated by conditions.

The benefits of providing accommodation for a self-build project and meeting demonstrable unmet need for self-build plots outweighed any limited harm to landscape character from the access, with conditions providing a proportionate response to make the development acceptable.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DM.22SP.2SP.11SP22SP.28SP.23
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 115Paragraph 116
Judgments
R v Leominster DC Ex p. Antique Country Buildings Ltd [1988] JPL 554; Mole Valley DC v Secretary of State [2025] EWHC 2127 (Admin); R (Lee Valley Regional Park Authority) v Epping Forest DC [2016] EWCA Civ 404

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

35 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wyre Forest

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed9 September 20266010714
    66 Belbroughton Road, Blakedown, Kidderminster, DY10 3JH
  2. Dismissed15 June 20263376007
    Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR
  3. Dismissed14 May 20266004729
    Grove Farmhouse, Drayton Road, Belbroughton, DY9 0BW
  4. Dismissed6 March 20266000482
    The Worralls, Pound Bank, Rock, Worcestershire, DY14 9RF
  5. Allowed10 February 20266001150
    Lower Kingsford Farm, Castle Hill Lane, Wolverley, Worcestershire, DY11 5SW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.