Planning appeal decision
Land at Oak Meadow Farm, Honeybrook Lane, Kidderminster, Worcestershire, DY11 5QS
Planning appeal 3342673 at Land at Oak Meadow Farm, Honeybrook Lane, Kidderminster, Worcestershire, DY11 5QS (Wyre Forest District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 6 February 2026 by Inspector Ghafoor A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
Erection of a new dwellinghouse and the creation of a new access
- Authority
- Wyre Forest District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Ghafoor A
- Postcode
- DY11 5QS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect on openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- Effect on landscape character
- If the development constitutes inappropriate development, whether other considerations clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and any other harm so as to amount to very special circumstances
What decided it
The development met NPPF155 criteria for residential development in the Green Belt, particularly the demonstrable unmet need for self-build housing plots, and any landscape harm could be adequately mitigated by conditions.
The benefits of providing accommodation for a self-build project and meeting demonstrable unmet need for self-build plots outweighed any limited harm to landscape character from the access, with conditions providing a proportionate response to make the development acceptable.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DM.22SP.2SP.11SP22SP.28SP.23
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 115Paragraph 116
- Judgments
- R v Leominster DC Ex p. Antique Country Buildings Ltd [1988] JPL 554; Mole Valley DC v Secretary of State [2025] EWHC 2127 (Admin); R (Lee Valley Regional Park Authority) v Epping Forest DC [2016] EWCA Civ 404
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wyre Forest
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed9 September 2026601071466 Belbroughton Road, Blakedown, Kidderminster, DY10 3JH
- Dismissed15 June 20263376007Foxwood Manor, 204-206 Wilden Lane, Stourport on Seven, DY13 9JR
- Dismissed14 May 20266004729Grove Farmhouse, Drayton Road, Belbroughton, DY9 0BW
- Dismissed6 March 20266000482The Worralls, Pound Bank, Rock, Worcestershire, DY14 9RF
- Allowed10 February 20266001150Lower Kingsford Farm, Castle Hill Lane, Wolverley, Worcestershire, DY11 5SW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®