Planning appeal decision
Former Wyevale Garden Centre, Hicks Gate, Keynsham, Bristol, BS31 2AD
Planning appeal 3342877 at Former Wyevale Garden Centre, Hicks Gate, Keynsham, Bristol, BS31 2AD (Bristol City Council) was dismissed on 26 March 2025 by Inspector Lewis D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.
Outline application for the demolition of existing buildings, removal of surface parking, and erection of buildings to accommodate 4,765 sq.m of commercial buildings (flexible Use Class E/B2/B8) with associated bins and bike stores. Associated hard and sof t landscaping. Vehicular access from the A4 Bath Road. Approval sought for the matters of Access
- Authority
- Bristol City Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Lewis D
- Postcode
- BS31 2AD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.
- Whether proposals made within the development scheme would offer a genuine choice of travel modes and encourage the use of sustainable modes of travel.
- The effects of the proposal on highway safety and the capacity of the A4 Bath Road.
- The effects of the proposal on landscape character, the appearance of the site and the visual amenity of the surrounding area.
- The effect of the proposed provision of commercial premises on the supply of employment land and floorspace, having regard to policies for regeneration and efficient use of land.
- The effects of planning conditions and planning obligations on the quality of the proposed development and mitigation of any potential adverse effects.
What decided it
The unacceptable impact on highway safety arising from unresolved deficiencies in both proposed A4 junction layouts and their traffic modelling, which alone justified refusal, combined with the failure to demonstrate very special circumstances to outweigh Green Belt harm.
The potential harms to the Green Belt and the additional identified harms (unsustainable location and highway safety) were not clearly outweighed by the employment and economic benefits and other positive considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist and the balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BCS5Policy BCS6Policy BCS7Policy BCS8Policy BCS9Policy BCS10Policy DM1Policy DM7Policy DM12Policy DM13Policy DM15Policy DM17Policy DM19Policy DM23Policy DM24Policy DS12Policy E2Policy E3Policy E4Policy E5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 50Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 124Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
- Judgments
- Vistry Homes Ltd v SoS Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and Others [2024] EWHC 2088 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bristol City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Split Decision20 March 202633724316 Upper York Street, St Pauls, Bristol, BS2 8QN
- Allowed8 May 20253357947The Old Tavern , Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DB
- Allowed9 April 2025335488835 Park Hill, Bristol, Bristol, BS11 0UH
- Allowed28 January 20253335671Nailsea Electrical Ltd, 102 Gloucester Road, Bishopston, Bristol, BS7 8BN
- Allowed10 December 202433466404 Hollway Road, Stockwood, Bristol, BS14 8PX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®