Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 March 20253342877

Former Wyevale Garden Centre, Hicks Gate, Keynsham, Bristol, BS31 2AD

Planning appeal 3342877 at Former Wyevale Garden Centre, Hicks Gate, Keynsham, Bristol, BS31 2AD (Bristol City Council) was dismissed on 26 March 2025 by Inspector Lewis D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.

Outline application for the demolition of existing buildings, removal of surface parking, and erection of buildings to accommodate 4,765 sq.m of commercial buildings (flexible Use Class E/B2/B8) with associated bins and bike stores. Associated hard and sof t landscaping. Vehicular access from the A4 Bath Road. Approval sought for the matters of Access

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
employment-industrial · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Lewis D
Postcode
BS31 2AD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.
  • Whether proposals made within the development scheme would offer a genuine choice of travel modes and encourage the use of sustainable modes of travel.
  • The effects of the proposal on highway safety and the capacity of the A4 Bath Road.
  • The effects of the proposal on landscape character, the appearance of the site and the visual amenity of the surrounding area.
  • The effect of the proposed provision of commercial premises on the supply of employment land and floorspace, having regard to policies for regeneration and efficient use of land.
  • The effects of planning conditions and planning obligations on the quality of the proposed development and mitigation of any potential adverse effects.

What decided it

The unacceptable impact on highway safety arising from unresolved deficiencies in both proposed A4 junction layouts and their traffic modelling, which alone justified refusal, combined with the failure to demonstrate very special circumstances to outweigh Green Belt harm.

The potential harms to the Green Belt and the additional identified harms (unsustainable location and highway safety) were not clearly outweighed by the employment and economic benefits and other positive considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist and the balance tipped against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BCS5Policy BCS6Policy BCS7Policy BCS8Policy BCS9Policy BCS10Policy DM1Policy DM7Policy DM12Policy DM13Policy DM15Policy DM17Policy DM19Policy DM23Policy DM24Policy DS12Policy E2Policy E3Policy E4Policy E5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 50Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 124Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
Judgments
Vistry Homes Ltd v SoS Levelling Up, Housing and Communities and Others [2024] EWHC 2088 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

54 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bristol City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Split Decision20 March 20263372431
    6 Upper York Street, St Pauls, Bristol, BS2 8QN
  2. Allowed8 May 20253357947
    The Old Tavern , Blackberry Hill, Bristol, BS16 1DB
  3. Allowed9 April 20253354888
    35 Park Hill, Bristol, Bristol, BS11 0UH
  4. Allowed28 January 20253335671
    Nailsea Electrical Ltd, 102 Gloucester Road, Bishopston, Bristol, BS7 8BN
  5. Allowed10 December 20243346640
    4 Hollway Road, Stockwood, Bristol, BS14 8PX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.