Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 December 20243343074

Land South Of Nevill Court, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN4 8NL

the conversion of building to dwelling and change of use to create new residential curtilage with access

Authority
Tunbridge Wells Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Glassar S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness and the purpose of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative visual and spatial impact of the new curtilage, hardstanding, pool, and access track would cause greater harm to the openness of the Green Belt than the existing development, and this substantial harm is not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of the proposal.

the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness was not clearly outweighed by the modest economic and social benefits of a single dwelling and the Council's 4.5-year housing land supply, such that very special circumstances do not exist

Framework references: 154, 155, 152, 153

Plan policies cited: Policy MGB1, Core Policy 2, Policy H13, Policy EN1, Policy EN25, Policy 4, Policy 14

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.