Planning appeal decision
Land Opposite Baytree House, Royal Lane, Eaton, Rushton, Tarporely, CW6 9XE
erection of up to two self-build custom houses with access and layout included, and matters of scale, appearance, and landscaping reserved for future consideration
- Authority
- Cheshire West and Chester
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Burnham T
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of Eaton Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal on the setting of Baytree House and Church Cottage
- the effect of the proposal on the setting of the Church of St Thomas and Royal Farm and Outbuildings
- whether the location of the proposals would be acceptable having regard to the locational strategy for development within the area
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
What decided it
The unacceptable impact on highway safety arising from inadequate visibility splays at the site access, combined with the less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area and the setting of Baytree House, outweighed the benefits of housing and self-build provision.
The public benefits of housing supply, self-build custom houses, hedgerow improvement, biodiversity net gain, and economic and social benefits were not sufficient to outweigh the harm to the significance of the Conservation Area, the harm to the setting of Baytree House, the harm to the setting of Royal Farm and Outbuildings, and the unacceptable harm to highway safety.
Plan policies cited: STRAT 1, STRAT 2, STRAT 8, STRAT 9, STRAT 10, ENV 5, ENV 6, DM 3, DM 19, DM 46, DM 47, T5
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®