Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 May 20253343235

34 Riverside, EGHAM, TW20 0AD

a rear extension and roof alterations to annex/garage building

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sylvester G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework
  • The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' required to justify it

What decided it

The disproportionate size of the proposed extension, when taken together with previous additions, would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness and character and appearance, which was not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 154, 143, 131, 135, 139

Plan policies cited: Policy EE14, Policy EE1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.