Planning appeal decision
The Firs Care Home, Wodehouse Lane, Dudley, DY3 4AE
Planning appeal 3343357 at The Firs Care Home, Wodehouse Lane, Dudley, DY3 4AE (South Staffordshire District Council) was dismissed on 9 December 2024 by Inspector Moore J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to national and local planning policies, including the effect upon openness.
Retrospective planning application for the construction of staff and customer car park extension
- Authority
- South Staffordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- community-institutional · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Moore J
- Postcode
- DY3 4AE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to national and local planning policies, including the effect upon openness
- the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to boundary treatments and trees
- the effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to light pollution
- the effect of the proposal upon biodiversity, with particular regard to light spill
- whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The benefits of the scheme did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, together with the harm to character and appearance and to protected trees, so very special circumstances were not established.
the benefits of a more accessible car park and improved highway operation, each attracting moderate weight, did not individually or cumulatively clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt and the moderate and significant harm respectively found to the character and appearance of the area and to protected trees
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy EQ4Policy EQ11Policy EQ9Policy EQ1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed21 October 20266012641The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
- Dismissed13 October 2026601334748 Enville Road, Kinver, DY7 6BX
- Allowed25 September 20266010537Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
- Dismissed23 September 20266008866The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
- Dismissed12 August 20266010048Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®