Planning appeal decision
Moneystone Quarry, Eaves Lane, Oakamoor, Staffordshire, ST10 2DZ
Planning appeal 3344014 at Moneystone Quarry, Eaves Lane, Oakamoor, Staffordshire, ST10 2DZ (Staffordshire Moorlands District Council) was allowed on 10 December 2024 by Inspector Longmuir J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issue is whether the proposed details in terms of appearance, scale, layout and landscaping would harm the character and appearance of the area.
reserved matters application for details of the appearance, scale, layout and landscaping for phase 1 of the leisure development comprising 190 lodges; erection of a new central hub building (providing farm shop, gym, swimming pool, spa, restaurant, cafe, games room, visitor centre, hub management and plant areas): reuse and external alterations to the existing office building to provide housekeeping and maintenance accommodation (including meeting rooms, offices, storage, staff areas and workshop); children's play areas; multi use games area; quarry park; car parking; refuse and lighting arrangements; and managed footpaths, cycleways and bridleways set in attractive hard and soft landscaping
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- leisure-sport · Unknown
- Inspector
- Longmuir J
- Postcode
- ST10 2DZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The main issue is whether the proposed details in terms of appearance, scale, layout and landscaping would harm the character and appearance of the area.
What decided it
The Inspector found that the detailed design of the lodges, hub building and landscaping would not harm the character and appearance of the area and that the proposal therefore accorded with the development plan as a whole.
the substantial economic, tourism, health and environmental benefits of the scheme, together with accordance with the development plan as a whole, outweighed the less than substantial harm identified to the setting of nearby listed buildings
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy SS11Policy DC1Policy E4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 2Paragraph 56Paragraph 57
- Judgments
- Friends of the Earth v SOSLUHC [2024] EWHC 2349 (Admin); (Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council [2024] UKSC 20; [2024] PTSR 988; R. (on the application of Swire) v Canterbury City Council [2022] EWHC 390 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Staffordshire Moorlands
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed9 June 20266003656The Twigg, Roughcote Lane, Caverswall, ST11 9ET
- Dismissed18 May 20263375459Land to the North of Eaves Lane, Armshead, Staffordshire, ST2 8LY
- Dismissed10 April 20266003240Side Farm, Cotton Bank, Cotton, Staffordshire, ST10 3DU
- Allowed21 November 20253366600Oakamoor Forest Lodges Ltd, Little Ranger Dimmingsdale, Oakamoor, Stoke-on-Trent, ST10 3AS
- Dismissed17 September 20253368361Banktop Farm Bank Top Holiday Cottages, Dilhorne, Stoke-on-Trent, ST10 2PN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®