Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 October 20243344681

10 Upper Cheyne Row, London, SW3 5JN

Planning appeal 3344681 at 10 Upper Cheyne Row, London, SW3 5JN (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was dismissed on 7 October 2024 by Inspector Han U, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Cheyne Conservation Area and its effect on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset known as 10 Upper Cheyne Row.

Various External Alterations to Front and Side of Dwelling; Roof Alterations; and Front Boundary Treatment Works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Han U
Postcode
SW3 5JN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Cheyne Conservation Area and its effect on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset known as 10 Upper Cheyne Row

What decided it

The cumulative effect of the proposed alterations, particularly the replacement of original aged tiles with new bright tiles and the disruption to the symmetry and original design of the paired houses, would cause significant harm to the non-designated heritage asset and conservation area that could not be justified by the limited public benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CL1Policy CL2Policy CL3Policy CL6Policy CL8Policy CL11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 208Paragraph 209

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 769 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929
    Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ
  2. Allowed23 June 20263362698
    Flat 1 at 28 Brunswick Gardens and Flat 2 at 30 Brunswick Gardens, London, W8 4AL
  3. Dismissed15 June 20266001948
    Land to End of Ledbury Mews West, London, W11 2QZ
  4. Dismissed2 June 20263376699
    Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR
  5. Dismissed19 May 20266003102
    Kensington High Street, Outside No. 254, London, W8 6ND

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.