Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 October 20243344681

10 Upper Cheyne Row, London, SW3 5JN

Various External Alterations to Front and Side of Dwelling; Roof Alterations; and Front Boundary Treatment Works

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Han U

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Cheyne Conservation Area and its effect on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset known as 10 Upper Cheyne Row

What decided it

The cumulative effect of the proposed alterations, particularly the replacement of original aged tiles with new bright tiles and the disruption to the symmetry and original design of the paired houses, would cause significant harm to the non-designated heritage asset and conservation area that could not be justified by the limited public benefits.

Framework references: 205, 208, 209

Plan policies cited: Policy CL1, Policy CL2, Policy CL3, Policy CL6, Policy CL8, Policy CL11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.