Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 February 20253344996

19 Spey Way, Romford, RM1 4YP

Planning appeal 3344996 at 19 Spey Way, Romford, RM1 4YP (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 17 February 2025 by Inspector Cryan M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

a 3-bedroom semi-detached single dwelling with 2 no. off street parking spaces

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cryan M
Postcode
RM1 4YP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The safety of pedestrians and other users of the highway

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area, combined with unresolved highway safety concerns, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefit of providing a single new dwelling, even under the tilted balance.

The modest social and economic benefit of providing a single new dwelling was significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the unacceptable harm to character and appearance and unresolved highway safety impacts when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 7 of the 2021 Havering Local PlanPolicy 26 of the 2021 Havering Local PlanPolicy D3 of the London Plan 2021Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021Policy 23 of the 2021 Havering Local PlanPolicy 24 of the 2021 Havering Local PlanPolicy T4 of the London Plan 2021
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 116

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

239 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 May 20266001193
    Archers Apartments, 27 Haysoms Close, Romford, Havering, RM1 4DL
  2. Dismissed21 May 20266004142
    1 Abbots Close, Havering, Rainham, Essex, RM13 9LA
  3. Dismissed21 May 20266003382
    Rear of 73 Front Lane, Upminster, RM14 1XL
  4. Allowed15 May 20266005087
    Land to the Rear of 55-67 Petersfield Avenue, Harold Hill, Romford, Havering, RM3 9PR
  5. Dismissed30 April 20266000610
    10 Parkland Avenue, Upminster, Upminster, RM14 2HA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.