Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 August 20243345799

31 Broomfield, Adel, Leeds, LS16 6AE

‘Retrospective application for electric gates at the entrance to the drive. Revised gate design proposals included’

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Morris T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The substantial height, width and solid appearance of the gates with their anthracite grey finish would be incongruous with and would significantly detract from the spacious and verdant character of the Broomfield street scene, conflicting with development plan policies requiring good design appropriate to local context.

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy (2019), Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy N25 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy HDG1 of the Leeds City Council Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2012), Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.