Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 January 20253345818

PAVEMENT O/S La Orient, 61-63 High Street, ESHER, KT10 9RQ

installation of a freestanding telephone apparatus with affixed defibrillator and advert display

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Edwards J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • For appeal A: the effect of the development on (i) the character and appearance of the area including whether it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Esher Conservation Area, and (ii) the setting and significance of the Bear Hotel, a grade II listed building
  • For appeal B: the effect of the advertisement on the visual amenity of the area

What decided it

The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting and significance of the listed building, combined with the Framework's requirement to give great weight to conservation of heritage assets, meant the moderate public benefits of the proposal could not outweigh the identified harm.

Plan policies cited: CS9, CS17, DM2, DM12, DM15

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.