Planning appeal decision
Pavement O/S La Orient, 61-63 High Street, Esher, KT10 9RQ
Planning appeal 3345818 at Pavement O/S La Orient, 61-63 High Street, Esher, KT10 9RQ (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 20 January 2025 by Inspector Edwards J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: For appeal A: the effect of the development on (i) the character and appearance of the area including whether it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Esher Conservation Area, and (ii) the setting and significance of the Bear Hotel, a grade II listed building.
installation of a freestanding telephone apparatus with affixed defibrillator and advert display
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Edwards J
- Postcode
- KT10 9RQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- For appeal A: the effect of the development on (i) the character and appearance of the area including whether it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Esher Conservation Area, and (ii) the setting and significance of the Bear Hotel, a grade II listed building
- For appeal B: the effect of the advertisement on the visual amenity of the area
What decided it
The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting and significance of the listed building, combined with the Framework's requirement to give great weight to conservation of heritage assets, meant the moderate public benefits of the proposal could not outweigh the identified harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS9CS17DM2DM12DM15
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed16 October 20266008605Pavement Outside Tesco Stores Ltd, 108 - 118 Walton Road East Molesey, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
- Dismissed16 October 20266008598Pavement Outside Tesco Ltd, 108 – 118 Walton Road, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
- Allowed31 July 20263376790195 Hurst Road, West Molesey, KT8 1SE
- Dismissed23 July 20266008608Footpath Outside 26 High Street, Esher, KT10 9RT
- Allowed4 March 20263376757Petrol Filling Station, 122 Portsmouth Road, Thames Ditton, Surrey, KT7 0XF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®