Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 February 20253345878

Land At Corner Of Fore Street & High Road , Eastcote, HA5 2ET

the erection of a new nursery (childcare) building and associated works

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Other minor developments
Inspector
Woodwards O

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal represents an acceptable form of development having regard to its flood zone location and the provisions of national and local planning policy
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety and the efficient operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeal site, particularly with regard to the provision of on-site car parking and drop-off facilities
  • whether or not the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the area, including to the CA, with regard to the proposed building, landscaping and loss of trees
  • the effect of the proposed development on the special architectural or historic interest of the Grade II listed buildings, 'New Cottages' and 'Flag Cottage' in terms of how the buildings are experienced in their settings
  • the effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • the effect of the proposed development on air quality
  • the effect of the proposed development on the provision of open space
  • the effect of the proposed development on local infrastructure

What decided it

The failure to adequately demonstrate through a proper sequential test that there were no reasonably available alternative sites at lower flood risk, combined with unmitigated harm to the conservation area character, unresolved biodiversity concerns regarding bat habitat, and unsecured air quality mitigation, meant the proposal failed to comply with the development plan and material considerations did not indicate otherwise.

Framework references: 11, 100, 116, 174, 175, 177, 193, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy DMEI9, Policy EM6, Policy SI12, Policy DMT1, Policy DMT2, Policy T2, Policy T4, Policy T5, Policy HC1, Policy G7, Policy HE1, Policy BE1, Policy DMHB1, Policy DMHB4, Policy DMHB11, Policy DMHB14, Policy DMHB2, Policy EM8, Policy DMEI14, Policy SI1, Policy G4, Policy EM4, Policy DMCI3, Policy DMCI7, Policy DF1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.