Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 February 20253345878

Land At Corner Of Fore Street & High Road , Eastcote, HA5 2ET

Planning appeal 3345878 at Land At Corner Of Fore Street & High Road , Eastcote, HA5 2ET (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 21 February 2025 by Inspector Woodwards O, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal represents an acceptable form of development having regard to its flood zone location and the provisions of national and local planning policy.

the erection of a new nursery (childcare) building and associated works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Other minor developments
Inspector
Woodwards O
Postcode
HA5 2ET

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal represents an acceptable form of development having regard to its flood zone location and the provisions of national and local planning policy
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety and the efficient operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeal site, particularly with regard to the provision of on-site car parking and drop-off facilities
  • whether or not the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the area, including to the CA, with regard to the proposed building, landscaping and loss of trees
  • the effect of the proposed development on the special architectural or historic interest of the Grade II listed buildings, 'New Cottages' and 'Flag Cottage' in terms of how the buildings are experienced in their settings
  • the effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • the effect of the proposed development on air quality
  • the effect of the proposed development on the provision of open space
  • the effect of the proposed development on local infrastructure

What decided it

The failure to adequately demonstrate through a proper sequential test that there were no reasonably available alternative sites at lower flood risk, combined with unmitigated harm to the conservation area character, unresolved biodiversity concerns regarding bat habitat, and unsecured air quality mitigation, meant the proposal failed to comply with the development plan and material considerations did not indicate otherwise.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMEI9Policy EM6Policy SI12Policy DMT1Policy DMT2Policy T2Policy T4Policy T5Policy HC1Policy G7Policy HE1Policy BE1Policy DMHB1Policy DMHB4Policy DMHB11Policy DMHB14Policy DMHB2Policy EM8Policy DMEI14Policy SI1Policy G4Policy EM4Policy DMCI3Policy DMCI7Policy DF1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 100Paragraph 116Paragraph 174Paragraph 175Paragraph 177Paragraph 193Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

421 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed7 August 20266005469
    10 Lawn Avenue, West Drayton, UB7 7AQ
  2. Dismissed23 July 20266004329
    14 Willow Tree Lane, Hayes, UB4 9BB
  3. Dismissed16 July 20266005866
    11 Maygoods View, High Road, Uxbridge, UB8 2HG
  4. Dismissed8 July 20266007587
    79 Fairholme Crescent, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8QU
  5. Dismissed12 June 20266002695
    96 Oakdene Road, Hillingdon, UB10 0SQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.