Planning appeal decision
Land at Chichele Road, Oxted, RH8 0NZ
Planning appeal 3345915 at Land at Chichele Road, Oxted, RH8 0NZ (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 11 December 2024 by Inspector Edwards S, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.
‘Proposed residential development 116 Dwellings (Class C3) including affordable housing with associated access, car parking, soft landscaping and play provision’
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Edwards S
- Postcode
- RH8 0NZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the Surrey Hills AONB/NL
- The effect of the development on Ancient Woodland and ecology
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety
- The effect of the proposal on surface water and foul drainage
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to the openness and purposes of the Green Belt, combined with significant harm to landscape character and the setting of the Surrey Hills AONB, was not clearly outweighed by the housing and other benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist.
The very significant weight given to market and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate weight to economic, biodiversity net gain and sustainability benefits and limited weight to custom build plots, did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and purposes and the significant harm to landscape character and the AONB setting, so the balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSP20Policy CSP21Policy CSP17Policy CSP4Policy CSP11Policy CSP12Policy DP5Policy DP7Policy DP19Policy DP21Policy DP10Policy DP13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 63Paragraph 96Paragraph 97Paragraph 102Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 173Paragraph 175Paragraph 180Paragraph 182Paragraph 186Paragraph 225
- Judgments
- Stroud DC v SSCLG & Gladman Developments Ltd [2015] EWHC 448 Admin; Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council v SSHCLG & Jerry Doherty [2021] EWHC 1082 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Allowed25 September 20266006497Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®