Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 December 20243345915

Land at Chichele Road, Oxted, RH8 0NZ

‘Proposed residential development 116 Dwellings (Class C3) including affordable housing with associated access, car parking, soft landscaping and play provision’

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Edwards S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the Surrey Hills AONB/NL
  • The effect of the development on Ancient Woodland and ecology
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • The effect of the proposal on surface water and foul drainage
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to the openness and purposes of the Green Belt, combined with significant harm to landscape character and the setting of the Surrey Hills AONB, was not clearly outweighed by the housing and other benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist.

The very significant weight given to market and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate weight to economic, biodiversity net gain and sustainability benefits and limited weight to custom build plots, did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and purposes and the significant harm to landscape character and the AONB setting, so the balance tipped against the proposal.

Framework references: 8, 11, 57, 63, 96, 97, 102, 142, 143, 152, 153, 173, 175, 180, 182, 186, 225

Plan policies cited: Policy CSP20, Policy CSP21, Policy CSP17, Policy CSP4, Policy CSP11, Policy CSP12, Policy DP5, Policy DP7, Policy DP19, Policy DP21, Policy DP10, Policy DP13

Judgments cited: Stroud DC v SSCLG & Gladman Developments Ltd [2015] EWHC 448 Admin; Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council v SSHCLG & Jerry Doherty [2021] EWHC 1082 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.