Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 December 20243345915

Land at Chichele Road, Oxted, RH8 0NZ

Planning appeal 3345915 at Land at Chichele Road, Oxted, RH8 0NZ (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 11 December 2024 by Inspector Edwards S, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.

‘Proposed residential development 116 Dwellings (Class C3) including affordable housing with associated access, car parking, soft landscaping and play provision’

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Edwards S
Postcode
RH8 0NZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the Surrey Hills AONB/NL
  • The effect of the development on Ancient Woodland and ecology
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • The effect of the proposal on surface water and foul drainage
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to the openness and purposes of the Green Belt, combined with significant harm to landscape character and the setting of the Surrey Hills AONB, was not clearly outweighed by the housing and other benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist.

The very significant weight given to market and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate weight to economic, biodiversity net gain and sustainability benefits and limited weight to custom build plots, did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and purposes and the significant harm to landscape character and the AONB setting, so the balance tipped against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CSP20Policy CSP21Policy CSP17Policy CSP4Policy CSP11Policy CSP12Policy DP5Policy DP7Policy DP19Policy DP21Policy DP10Policy DP13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 63Paragraph 96Paragraph 97Paragraph 102Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 173Paragraph 175Paragraph 180Paragraph 182Paragraph 186Paragraph 225
Judgments
Stroud DC v SSCLG & Gladman Developments Ltd [2015] EWHC 448 Admin; Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council v SSHCLG & Jerry Doherty [2021] EWHC 1082 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

76 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed29 October 20266006369
    Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014139
    31a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
  3. Dismissed14 October 20266008351
    Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266007518
    Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
  5. Allowed25 September 20266006497
    Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.