Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld9 October 20243346332

Moor Lane, Roeburndale West , Hornby, Lancaster, LA2 9LL

Without planning permission, the change of use from agricultural land to a mixed use comprising agricultural and recreational use, the erection of buildings and the storage of materials along the eastern boundary

Authority
Lancaster City Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Hitchcock R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Ground (b): whether the matters alleged in the notice have occurred
  • Ground (c): whether the matters alleged constitute a breach of planning control
  • Ground (f): whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach

What decided it

The Inspector's finding that buildings 1-5 constituted unauthorised 'buildings' facilitating the recreational use meant the use fell outside the GPDO Part 4 Class B temporary use exemption, establishing the breach of planning control.

Judgments cited: Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keen Baldwin's Iron and Steel Co Ltd [1949] 1QB 385; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR & Harrow LBC (No. 2) [2000] EWCA Civ 5569; [2000] JPL 1025; Ramsey v SSETR & Suffolk Coastal DC [2002] JPL 1123; Murfitt v SSE & East Cambridgeshire CC [1980] JPL 598; Somak Travel v SSE & Brent LBC [1987] JPL 630

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.