Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 March 20253346339

The Coppice, Ullenhall, HENLEY-IN-ARDEN, B95 5PW

a replacement two storey extension, fenestration alterations, open canopy porch and associated works to facilitate loft conversion (part retrospective); demolition of single storey dining room; demolition of an outbuilding

Authority
Stratford-on-Avon District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Manley N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposals constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the Framework and development plan policies, including their effect on openness
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposals

What decided it

The proposals constitute disproportionate additions over and above the size of the original building contrary to paragraph 154(c) of the Framework, causing substantial harm to Green Belt openness which is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 143, 153, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy CS.10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.