Planning appeal decision
Field, Westerton Road, Tingley, Wakefield, WF3 1AE
Planning appeal 3346387 at Field, Westerton Road, Tingley, Wakefield, WF3 1AE (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 5 November 2024 by Inspector Mulloy C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is an appropriate location for housing with regard to the development plan – and if not, whether there are other considerations which would justify a grant of outline planning permission.
outline planning application for the erection of up to 9 no. dwellings with all matters reserved (save for the principal access off Westerton Road), parking, landscaping, private gardens and public open space at land off Westerton Road, West Ardsley, Leeds WF3 1AE
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Mulloy C
- Postcode
- WF3 1AE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is an appropriate location for housing with regard to the development plan – and if not, whether there are other considerations which would justify a grant of outline planning permission
What decided it
The proposal's clear conflict with Policy N11 of the UDP, which protects the appeal site as part of the Haigh Wood open land designation, carries significant weight that is not overcome by the moderate benefits of additional housing supply and economic benefits, particularly given the Council's adequate five-year housing land supply.
The conflict with Policy N11 carries significant weight against the development; the considerations in favour (additional market housing supply, economic benefits, and recreation and biodiversity improvements) collectively carry moderate weight but are insufficient to overcome the statutory presumption in favour of the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy N11Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006)Policy HG2-168Policy HG2-169Site Allocations Plan (January 2019)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 8bParagraph 97Paragraph 102Paragraph 225
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed15 October 20266010414Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP
- Dismissed15 October 2026601041384 – 90 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed30 September 202660118272 Rookwood Avenue, Osmondthorpe, Leeds, LS9 0NW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®