Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 January 20253346934

597 Ashingdon Road, Rochford, SS4 3JF

Planning appeal 3346934 at 597 Ashingdon Road, Rochford, SS4 3JF (Rochford District Council) was dismissed on 8 January 2025 by Inspector Hall C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development represents inappropriate development within the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

the retention of an existing outbuilding labelled 'A' and the proposed alteration to an existing outbuilding labelled 'B' part retrospective

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hall C
Postcode
SS4 3JF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development represents inappropriate development within the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • If the development does amount to inappropriate development, the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If the development does amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm to the Green Belt and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other material considerations, such that very special circumstances exist to warrant a grant of permission

What decided it

The cumulative scale and bulk of the outbuildings are disproportionate to the original dwelling and constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt that causes harm to openness which is not clearly outweighed by other material considerations.

What the Inspector cited

National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

63 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rochford

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266008122
    Milan Villa, Hyde Wood Lane , Canewdon, Rochford, SS4 3RR
  2. Notice varied and upheld2 September 20263372996
    Land at Limehouse Nursery (Also Known As 401 Eastwood Road), The Drive, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 7LJ
  3. Allowed9 July 20266004863
    9 College Gardens, Rochford, SS4 1YL
  4. Dismissed4 June 20266006133
    The Barns, Blounts Farm, Murrels Lane, SS5 6AB
  5. Dismissed5 May 20266001653
    St. Mary’s House, Rectory Road, Hawkwell, SS5 4LL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.