®Planning appeal decision
112-114 North End Rd, London, W14 9PP
Planning appeal 3347032 at 112-114 North End Rd, London, W14 9PP (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 14 November 2024 by Inspector Edwards J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would accord with development plan policies on car-free development and air quality.
the erection of 3no. additional floors at first, second and third floor levels to existing ground floor commercial unit, in connection with the creation of 8no. new residential units comprising of 2no. studios and 6no. two bedro om self-contained flats together with balconies at first, second and third floors; alterations to ground floor frontage; formation of cycle storage and provision of access at ground level
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Edwards J
- Postcode
- W14 9PP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would accord with development plan policies on car-free development and air quality
- Whether it would integrate appropriately with the adjacent car repair and service workshop at the CC site having regard to the effects of noise
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Barons Court Conservation Area and its effect on the setting and significance of 106 to 110 North End Road as locally listed buildings of merit
What decided it
The failure to secure car-free development through a properly executed planning obligation, combined with inadequate noise assessment evidence, meant the proposal breached the development plan and the identified harms significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy T4Policy T6Policy T2Policy CC10Policy SI1Policy CC11Policy DC1Policy DC4Policy DC8Policy HC1Policy D4Policy SD6
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Quashed On Legal Grounds18 September 20263355656Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE
- Dismissed21 August 2026601016715 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
- Dismissed21 August 2026601016313 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
- Dismissed21 August 20266009772Pavement Outside 297 King Street, Hammersmith, W6 9NH
- Dismissed15 June 20266006413110-112 Uxbridge Road, London, W12 8LR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.