Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 March 20253347147

6 Walsingham Road, Burnham Thorpe, KING'S LYNN, PE31 8HN

full planning permission for a single dwelling with associated landscaping, vehicular access and parking

Authority
King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Storey P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area, and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Conservation Area

What decided it

The substantial reduction in height of the traditional boundary wall would significantly diminish its positive contribution to the Conservation Area's character and appearance, causing less than substantial but considerable harm that would not be outweighed by the limited public benefits of a single dwelling.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Conservation Area, given considerable weight, was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of housing delivery and heritage conservation measures, even under the tilted balance of paragraph 11(d) of the Framework

Framework references: 11, 212, 213, 215

Plan policies cited: CS01, CS08, DM15

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); Dorothy Bohm v SSCLG [2017] EWHC 3217

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.