Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision12 November 20243347323

15 Rushdene Road, Eastcote, Hillingdon, HA5 1SW

the ‘Erection of single storey extension to the side and rear and installation of front canopy roof, rear canopy (retrospective application).’

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Somers J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the existing building and the character and appearance of the locality
  • The effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with specific consideration around access to light, privacy, and sense of enclosure

What decided it

The front and rear canopies were detrimental to the character and appearance of the locality and the existing building contrary to LPDM Policies DMHD1 and DMHB11, whereas the side and rear extensions were compliant with these policies and acceptable.

Plan policies cited: DMHB11, DMHD1, Policy D3 of the London Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.