Planning appeal decision
Oak Tree Farm, Gibbs Lane, Oakhanger, Bordon, GU35 9JS
Planning appeal 3347356 at Oak Tree Farm, Gibbs Lane, Oakhanger, Bordon, GU35 9JS (East Hampshire District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 12 May 2025 by Inspector Graham J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on protected habitats and species.
the siting of two residential static caravans, and erection of utility building/day room to provide accommodation for a Traveller family
- Authority
- East Hampshire District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Graham J
- Postcode
- GU35 9JS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on protected habitats and species
- The effect upon the character and appearance of the area
- The extent to which services and facilities would be accessible from the Appeal Site by sustainable modes of transport
- Whether there is adequate and legal access to and from the Appeal Site for both pedestrians and vehicle users
- The need for Gypsy and Traveller pitches, and the availability of suitable alternative sites
- The personal circumstances of the occupiers, and the best interests of any children
What decided it
The inability to rule out an adverse effect on the integrity of the Shortheath Common SAC and Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA, absent any secured mitigation or imperative reasons of overriding public interest under the Habitats Regulations, prevented the grant of planning permission notwithstanding the very substantial weight of other material considerations.
Very substantial material considerations in favour of the proposal (unmet Traveller need, lack of five-year pitch supply, absence of alternative accommodation, policy failure, and the best interests of the child) were outweighed by conflict with the Development Plan as a whole and by the Habitats Regulations, which prevented the grant of permission even for a temporary period.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP15Policy CP20Policy CP22Policy CP29Policy CP31draft Policy NBE4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 115Paragraph 110Paragraph 11Paragraph 195
- Judgments
- Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest DC [1972] 1 WLR 1207
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hampshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Invalid29 July 202633487508 Downhouse Road, Waterlooville, PO8 0TX
- Dismissed17 June 20266005417Land to the South of Kingsley Tennis Centre, Forge Road, Bordon, GU35 9NG
- Notice varied and upheld22 January 2026334161916B The Green, Rowland's Castle, PO9 6BN
- Quashed On Legal Grounds30 December 20253346355High Acres Willis Lane, Four Marks, Alton, GU34 5AP
- Notice varied and upheld11 December 20253368242Lot 10b Comley Hill, Rowlands Castle, Hampshire, PO9 5ND
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®