Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 February 20253347672

89 North Road, Southall, UB1 2JN

Construction of a two-storey building with part basement level to accommodate commercial/public house space (Mixed Use Class E/Sui Generis) and 6 self -contained residential units (Use Class C3); installation of solar panels; and provision of associated amenity spaces, cycle and refuse storage (following demolition of the existing building)

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hughes L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on an existing community facility
  • the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of future occupiers with regard to internal living space
  • the living conditions of 1 Shackleton Road with regard to outlook
  • highway safety

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan on multiple grounds—loss of a valued community facility without justification, harm to character and appearance, inadequate internal space standards for residential units, overbearing impact on neighbouring outlook, and highway safety concerns—and material considerations do not indicate the appeal should be decided otherwise.

Framework references: 98, 135

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy HC7, London Plan Policy D4, London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy D6, London Plan Policy T3, London Plan Policy T4, Ealing Development Management DPD Policy 7.4, Ealing Development Management DPD Policy 7A, Ealing Development Management DPD Policy 7B, Ealing Core Strategy Policy 1.1(e)(i), Ealing Core Strategy Policy 3.8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.