Planning appeal decision
Marsden Nursery and Garden Centre, Pleasure Pit Road, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1HU
Planning appeal 3347843 at Marsden Nursery and Garden Centre, Pleasure Pit Road, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1HU (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 16 April 2025 by Inspector Webb B, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development would be inappropriate in the Green Belt, including whether it would meet the 'Golden Rules' and within this context make appropriate provision of affordable housing.
erection of 23 dwellings (including 4 affordable units) with associated access, car parking and garaging, refuse/recycling storage, landscaping, earthworks and infrastructure following demolition and removal of existing buildings and structures
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Webb B
- Postcode
- KT21 1HU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the development would be inappropriate in the Green Belt, including whether it would meet the 'Golden Rules' and within this context make appropriate provision of affordable housing
- the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- if the development was inappropriate, whether harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The scheme's failure to meet the Green Belt 'Golden Rules', particularly its failure to provide sufficient affordable housing, meant the harm from inappropriateness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to very special circumstances.
The other considerations in favour of the scheme attracted at best limited weight and did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriateness and openness, together with the significant harm from insufficient affordable housing, so very special circumstances were not demonstrated.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN1Policy EN4Policy H3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157Paragraph 73Paragraph 55
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®