Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds18 February 20253347934

Land South of Cidermill Hatch, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, Dorking, RH5 5BP

Planning appeal 3347934 at Land South of Cidermill Hatch, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, Dorking, RH5 5BP (Mole Valley District Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 18 February 2025 by Inspector Willows P, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate within the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

a two pitch settled gypsy accommodation site including widening of existing access. Appeal

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Willows P
Postcode
RH5 5BP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate within the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt and its purposes
  • Whether the development accords with local and national policies concerning the location of gypsy and traveller accommodation
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the site is suitably located in terms of access to necessary services, facilities and public transport
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether any harm to the Green Belt, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, including any need for the development and the personal circumstances of those living at the site, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate an up-to-date 5-year supply of deliverable Gypsy and Traveller pitches triggered the paragraph 11(d) tilted balance, which was not outweighed by the identified harms.

The character and Green Belt policy conflicts and the harm of intentional unauthorised development were outweighed by the lack of a 5-year pitch supply, the sustainability benefits of a settled base, and limited personal need, so that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits and permission was granted.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN1Policy H5Policy EN4Policy EN8Policy INF1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 143Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

35 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266008528
    Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
  4. Allowed11 September 20266012763
    Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
  5. Dismissed9 September 20266005433
    Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.