Planning appeal decision
Land South of Cidermill Hatch, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, Dorking, RH5 5BP
Planning appeal 3347934 at Land South of Cidermill Hatch, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, Dorking, RH5 5BP (Mole Valley District Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 18 February 2025 by Inspector Willows P, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate within the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
a two pitch settled gypsy accommodation site including widening of existing access. Appeal
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Willows P
- Postcode
- RH5 5BP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is inappropriate within the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt and its purposes
- Whether the development accords with local and national policies concerning the location of gypsy and traveller accommodation
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the site is suitably located in terms of access to necessary services, facilities and public transport
- If the development is inappropriate, whether any harm to the Green Belt, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, including any need for the development and the personal circumstances of those living at the site, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate an up-to-date 5-year supply of deliverable Gypsy and Traveller pitches triggered the paragraph 11(d) tilted balance, which was not outweighed by the identified harms.
The character and Green Belt policy conflicts and the harm of intentional unauthorised development were outweighed by the lack of a 5-year pitch supply, the sustainability benefits of a settled base, and limited personal need, so that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits and permission was granted.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN1Policy H5Policy EN4Policy EN8Policy INF1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 143Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®