Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 February 20253348058

Mayfield Pudsey Hall Lane, Canewdon, ROCHFORD, SS4 3RY

proposed new roof form over entire bungalow with front and rear dormers to create habitable space at first floor and ground floor infill extension with front door moved to the principle elevation

Authority
Rochford District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Francis L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would result in disproportionate additions to the original building contrary to NPPF paragraph 154c and Policy DM17, constituting inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it.

Framework references: 153, 154, 154c, 154g

Plan policies cited: Policy DM17, Policy DM1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.