Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 April 20253348137

Ileden Farm Barn, Ileden Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6HP

Planning appeal 3348137 at Ileden Farm Barn, Ileden Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6HP (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 3 April 2025 by Inspector De Freitas Terceiro P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site represents an appropriate location for the proposed development, having particular regard to relevant provisions of the development plan and national policy.

the change of use (current use sui generis) to light industrial use - E(g)(iii) - involving workshop space with ancillary storage, ancillary office and staff wellness area

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
De Freitas Terceiro P
Postcode
CT4 6HP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site represents an appropriate location for the proposed development, having particular regard to relevant provisions of the development plan and national policy

What decided it

The site's location outside any settlement boundary in the countryside, combined with the proposal's lack of specific requirement to be in a rural area, conflicts with the development plan's spatial strategy directing development to urban areas, and this conflict is not overcome by national policy or other material considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy EMP13Policy EMP14Policy SP1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 88

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

9 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266008107
    Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
  2. Dismissed28 September 20266008105
    Dane Cottage, Hogg Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
  3. Allowed24 September 20266010614
    82 Island Wall, Whitstable, CT5 1EL
  4. Allowed18 September 20266009081
    Ground Floor, 2 Douglas Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6AE
  5. Dismissed11 August 20266009628
    69 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.