Planning appeal decision
Ileden Farm Barn, Ileden Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6HP
Planning appeal 3348137 at Ileden Farm Barn, Ileden Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6HP (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 3 April 2025 by Inspector De Freitas Terceiro P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site represents an appropriate location for the proposed development, having particular regard to relevant provisions of the development plan and national policy.
the change of use (current use sui generis) to light industrial use - E(g)(iii) - involving workshop space with ancillary storage, ancillary office and staff wellness area
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Change of use
- Inspector
- De Freitas Terceiro P
- Postcode
- CT4 6HP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site represents an appropriate location for the proposed development, having particular regard to relevant provisions of the development plan and national policy
What decided it
The site's location outside any settlement boundary in the countryside, combined with the proposal's lack of specific requirement to be in a rural area, conflicts with the development plan's spatial strategy directing development to urban areas, and this conflict is not overcome by national policy or other material considerations.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy EMP13Policy EMP14Policy SP1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 88
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Canterbury City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed28 September 20266008107Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
- Dismissed28 September 20266008105Dane Cottage, Hogg Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
- Allowed24 September 2026601061482 Island Wall, Whitstable, CT5 1EL
- Allowed18 September 20266009081Ground Floor, 2 Douglas Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6AE
- Dismissed11 August 2026600962869 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®