Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 May 20253348448

Land Off Creeting Road West, Stowmarket, Suffolk, IP14 5AT

Planning appeal 3348448 at Land Off Creeting Road West, Stowmarket, Suffolk, IP14 5AT (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 12 May 2025 by Inspector Knight A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location having regard to local policies on employment uses.

erection of 6no 1-bedroom flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Knight A
Postcode
IP14 5AT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location having regard to local policies on employment uses
  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity

What decided it

The proposal's failure to comply with Policy LP10 by not demonstrating that the possibility of re-using or redeveloping the land for employment or community uses had been explored through sustained marketing, combined with the modest scale of housing benefits, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan as a whole.

The significant weight given to the provision of new housing was outweighed by the harm arising from conflict with Policy LP10 protecting employment land, and minor economic and social benefits during construction and occupation were insufficient to tip the balance in favour of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP10Policy SP09Policy LP16
Judgments
Panton v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999) 79 P & CR 186

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

22 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266012038
    The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
  2. Dismissed14 September 20266010281
    1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
  3. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  4. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
    Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.