Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 November 20243348505

42 Station Road, STOKE D'ABERNON, Surrey, KT11 3BN

a rear dormer window and front rooflights to create studio flat and single-storey rear extension to existing commercial unit and re-arrangement of the external access stairs

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wyborn D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed dormer and external staircase on the character and appearance of the host building and area
  • the effect of the proposed balcony on the living conditions of the occupiers of the first floor flat, having regard to the impact of any loss of light
  • whether or not the scheme would represent an acceptable form of development having regard to any flood risk and the provisions of the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework)
  • whether or not the development would make suitable provision for any requirements for affordable housing
  • the effect of the development on the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (the SPA)

What decided it

The failure of the flood risk sequential test and the unresolved likely significant adverse effect on the Thames Basin Heaths SPA (due to the absence of a secured SAMM contribution) provided clear reasons for refusal that disengaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development.

the limited to moderate benefits of the additional housing unit were outweighed by the harms to character and appearance, flood risk, affordable housing provision and the SPA, which weighed very substantially against the proposal

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CS10, Policy CS17, Policy DM2, Policy CS26, Policy CS21, Policy CS13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.